<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>New guidance on S106,  10 dwelling threshold for affordable housing – and N</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=10382244" />
  <subtitle>New guidance on S106,  10 dwelling threshold for affordable housing – and N</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=10382244</id>
  <updated>2026-07-26T18:28:13Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-26T18:28:13Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: New guidance on S106,  10 dwelling threshold for affordable housing – a</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10411613" />
    <author>
      <name>Daniel Hudson</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10411613</id>
    <updated>2015-01-05T15:00:19Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-05T15:00:19Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	One of the many unforeseen (by CLG)&amp;nbsp;consequences of this measure is that it will hinder and demoralize communities preparing Neighbourhood Plans, many of which are founded on a preference for small sites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Leaving aside the question of the weight of the new guidance, there is a major question mark about whether a Neighbourhood Planning Policy which sought to override national policy would satisfy basic condition a) on having regard to national policy and at the very least, by advancing such a policy, they would be placing the success of the plan at examination at risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	There may be a further risk that in progressing to examination with a small sites strategy, the Examiner may recommend that the plan be amended to remove affordable housing requirements from small sites, thereby leaving the Parish with a plan with no means of delivering affordable housing and a portfolio of market only sites. This would be a hard sell at referendum stage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Hudson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-05T15:00:19Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>New guidance on S106,  10 dwelling threshold for affordable housing – and N</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10382243" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10382243</id>
    <updated>2014-12-31T08:13:42Z</updated>
    <published>2014-12-31T08:12:42Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&amp;nbsp;
&lt;p&gt;
	We have been asked by a parish council if &amp;nbsp;a Neighbourhood Plan policy could&amp;nbsp; be devised &amp;nbsp;to over-ride the recently introduced national &amp;nbsp;10 dwelling threshold so that they can secure affordable homes in their village.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	As the guidance, if I understand correctly, has the status of policy as it was in a ministerial statement&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;is this possible if the Neighbourhood Plan policy was evidence based – or is it a non-starter.?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	If it is not possible then Neighbourhood Plans can only assist delivery of affordable housing on larger sites of 10 or more dwellings which it will more &amp;nbsp;difficult to identify &amp;nbsp;in small villages. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I am aware that the threshold for affordable housing does not extend to Rural Exception Sites – but I cannot see that a Rural Exception Site could be identified in a Neighbourhood Plan as it would not then be contrary to policy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Any advice welcome&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Alison&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-31T08:12:42Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
