<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Playing pitch strategy and existing allocations</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=469192426" />
  <subtitle>Playing pitch strategy and existing allocations</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=469192426</id>
  <updated>2026-07-28T10:07:34Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-28T10:07:34Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Playing pitch strategy and existing allocations</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=469192425" />
    <author>
      <name>Catherine Denning-Johnson</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=469192425</id>
    <updated>2021-05-24T08:58:18Z</updated>
    <published>2021-05-24T06:56:25Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hello all, hoping to use the collective 'brain trust' here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We completed a Stage E Playing Pitch Strategy refresh during 2019-20
  as part of our evidence base for our Regulation 18 plan and have been
  advised we will need to develop a new PPS from Stage A onwards for
  Regulation 19 by Sport England.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the areas we have been asked to investigate more fully within
  the new PPS is to provide evidence that a number of site allocations
  that are being carried over from the previous plan that were last used
  as playing pitches remain unneeded for use as playing pitches.  The
  majority of these sites have outline PP with conditions being
  regularly discharged, however we have been advised that should a new
  application come forward or the current OP expire then Sport England
  would object on the basis it is not proved unneeded.  We were of the
  understanding that due to their status as existing allocations and the
  presence of active landowners and developers working to bring the land
  forward we would not need to re-assess these sites in terms of their
  continued use as historic pitches but this has been proven incorrect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have a very limited local land supply and at the moment expect to
  only be able to meet approximately 45% of our LAHN and the former
  playing pitches make up around 2-3 years worth of supply.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm seeking some advice on how other LPA have incorporated historic
  pitches that are existing allocations or already have PP into their
  playing pitch strategies- bearing in mind condition surveys and so on
  as I do not have any examples to hand.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Catherine Denning-Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-24T06:56:25Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
