<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Sourcing sites for SHELAAs and Local Plans - how wide to 'cast the net'?</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=607533298" />
  <subtitle>Sourcing sites for SHELAAs and Local Plans - how wide to 'cast the net'?</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=607533298</id>
  <updated>2026-08-03T05:11:47Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-03T05:11:47Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Sourcing sites for SHELAAs and Local Plans - how wide to 'cast the net'?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=607533297" />
    <author>
      <name>Laura Chamberlain</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=607533297</id>
    <updated>2022-02-11T16:02:50Z</updated>
    <published>2022-02-11T15:33:26Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would be interested to hear people's views and experience in sourcing
  site options for SHELAAs and for the Local Plan process. The PPG is
  clear that we should cast the net wide and look for sites from a wide
  range of sources. Also conscious of the need to make sure any
  reasonable alternatives are considered for SA/SEA purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However when the resourcing reality of assessing a huge raft of
  possible sites hits , we can't help wonder if there is a more
  proportionate, but still 'sound' approach, especially in the context
  of not needing all that many new sites given existing supply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would be interested to hear from any LPAs who have effectively
  started with a 'clean slate' of site options in their Local Plan
  Reviews based on existing allocations, commitments and then just newly
  submitted sites through Call for Sites exercises, and conversely LPAs
  who have considered that all known possible site sources should be
  brought into the process, even if not recently submitted, for example
  sites considered in historic plan making exercises.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;br&gt; Laura&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Laura Chamberlain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-11T15:33:26Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
