<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Query re Class I of the GPDO (C4 to C3)</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=6223832" />
  <subtitle>Query re Class I of the GPDO (C4 to C3)</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=6223832</id>
  <updated>2026-07-26T09:27:04Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-26T09:27:04Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Query re Class I of the GPDO (C4 to C3)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=6223831" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=6223831</id>
    <updated>2014-07-07T11:17:59Z</updated>
    <published>2014-07-07T11:17:59Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; It appears that the intention of Class I was to permit a change of a C4 house/flat to a single C3 unit. Based on the wording of Class I however it appears that it actually permits a change to multiple C3 units (e.g. a C4 house to five flats).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; Government has confirmed that it is intended that Class J permits a change from B1(a) to multiple C3 units, and the same wording is used in Class J and Class I:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &lt;em&gt;J. Development consisting of a change of use of a building and any land within its curtilage &lt;strong&gt;to a use falling within Class C3 (dwellinghouses) of the Schedule to the Use Classes Order&lt;/strong&gt; from a use falling within Class B1(a) (offices) of that Schedule.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &lt;em&gt;I. Development consisting of a change of the use of a building—&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &lt;em&gt;(a) &lt;strong&gt;to a use falling within Class C3 (dwellinghouses) of the Schedule to the Use Classes Order&lt;/strong&gt; from a use falling within Class C4 (houses in multiple occupation) of that Schedule;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &lt;em&gt;(b) to a use falling within Class C4 of that Schedule from a use falling within&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &lt;em&gt;Class C3.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; Therefore, logically, it appears that the wording of Class I also permits a change to multiple C3 units.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; So for example, a C4 dwelling could convert to five flats without permission, or a C3 dwelling could change to C4 as a permitted change, and at some point in the future change to multiple C3 units without permission.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; Does anyone have a view on this interpretation? I would be interested to know if this has been tested through for example a Lawful Development Certificate application.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p style="margin-left:36.0pt;"&gt; Many thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-07T11:17:59Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
