<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Including a Windfall allowance in 5 year supply</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=647684130" />
  <subtitle>Including a Windfall allowance in 5 year supply</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=647684130</id>
  <updated>2026-08-12T17:53:51Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-12T17:53:51Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Including a Windfall allowance in 5 year supply</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=647684129" />
    <author>
      <name>Jonathan Pheasant</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=647684129</id>
    <updated>2022-05-04T08:02:48Z</updated>
    <published>2022-05-03T13:41:24Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Just seeking advice about this. Maybe someone has recent knowledge of
  a PINS/Inspector's view?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NPPF says you need a supply of SPECIFIC* deliverable sites for 5
  years (Para 74). This implies the 5YS should really be specific, known
  sites which are by definition 'deliverable' in terms of the glossary
  which means you know information about them. *my emphasis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Para 48 of the original NPPF said  &amp;quot;Local planning authorities
  may make an allowance for windfall sites in the five-year supply if
  they have compelling evidence that such sites have consistently become
  available in the local area and will continue to provide a reliable
  source of supply.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, that paragraph is no longer in the Framework. There is now a
  paragraph 71 which says &amp;quot;Where an allowance is to be made for
  windfall sites as part of anticipated supply, there should be
  compelling evidence that they will provide a reliable source of supply&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems odd that the reference to '5 year supply' has been removed
  in the new version so does that mean that you can have a windfall
  allowance in your general housing supply (Housing Trajectory) but not
  your 5 year supply because that is only for specific, known and
  deliverable sites?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is notable that Para 71 is in the section about policy making and
  before Para 74 which is about 'Maintaining Supply and Delivery'.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyone have any views?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cheers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Jonathan Pheasant</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-05-03T13:41:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
