<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Affordable Housing, OAN and Viability</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=10559839" />
  <subtitle>Affordable Housing, OAN and Viability</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=10559839</id>
  <updated>2026-05-17T15:26:07Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-17T15:26:07Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Affordable Housing, OAN and Viability</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10559838" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10559838</id>
    <updated>2015-01-19T14:25:16Z</updated>
    <published>2015-01-19T14:25:16Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Is anyone aware of any examples where an authority has been required to increase their OAN in order to meet affordable housing needs, as viability of development has meant&amp;nbsp;that a&amp;nbsp;lower afforable houisng policy&amp;nbsp;requirements has had to be set?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Or on the contrary where a Plan has been found sound (post NPPF) without meeting the full afforable housing needs?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Many thanks&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-01-19T14:25:16Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
