NPPF changes and Local Plan Reg 19 consultationNPPF changes and Local Plan Reg 19 consultationhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&threadId=10568240972026-03-11T00:56:50Z2026-03-11T00:56:50ZRE: NPPF changes and Local Plan Reg 19 consultationrichard whitehttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=10605743862024-07-30T14:06:39Z2024-07-30T14:06:13Z<p>Some very interesting draft transition provisions from 226</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-reforms-to-the-national-planning-policy-framework-and-other-changes-to-the-planning-system">https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-reforms-to-the-national-planning-policy-framework-and-other-changes-to-the-planning-system</a></p>richard white2024-07-30T14:06:13ZRE: NPPF changes and Local Plan Reg 19 consultationAndrew Chalmershttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=10599941672024-07-29T10:27:52Z2024-07-29T10:27:52Z<p>Does it also perhaps depend on any transitional arrangements that government chooses to include in any modified NPPF. It would seem peverse for you to got on with a plan, then potentially have to change tack markedly. As ever hindsight is a wonderful thing, but to have flexibility built in for changed approaches especially when we know the changes are coming would be logical or have options and evidence for different approaches. Of course that sets aside the politics of this.</p>
<p>In that regard authorities who have progressed plans having rejected any prospects of Green Belt release and going well below housing need (as currently measured) are going struggle it seems in the post-election planning world. We shall find out later this week, possibly tomorrow. </p>Andrew Chalmers2024-07-29T10:27:52ZRE: NPPF changes and Local Plan Reg 19 consultationEmma Youngerhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=10599348062024-07-29T08:31:58Z2024-07-29T08:31:58Z<p>Hi Roger,</p>
<p>We had an experience similar to this in that we undertook a Reg 19 consultation on our Local Plan in 2020 with housing nos based on the proposed change to the standard method of using 2018 population data. When the government consultation response was published that they were going to stick to 2014 data, we had to revise the plan and undertook a second Reg 19 on the revisions. As this was predominantely about additional site allocations, these had previously been consulted on at Reg 18, so not wholesale new policy being introduced. I guess it will depend on the extent the plan needs to change which will help with your decision? </p>Emma Younger2024-07-29T08:31:58ZNPPF changes and Local Plan Reg 19 consultationRoger Ransonhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=10568240962024-07-22T11:57:03Z2024-07-22T11:57:02Z<p>Looking for any advice on what to do if changes to the NPPF are announced either immediately before, during, or after a Reg 19 consultation but prior to submission.</p>
<p>Realise that this is a difficult question to answer when the changes are not known but wondering whether anyone has experience of dealing with such a scenario either through further Reg 19 consultation on an addendum or leaving this for any main modifcations through examination.</p>
<p>Any comments appreciated! </p>Roger Ranson2024-07-22T11:57:02Z