<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Prior Approvals</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=10809376" />
  <subtitle>Prior Approvals</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=10809376</id>
  <updated>2026-05-11T05:53:43Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-11T05:53:43Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Prior Approvals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10826897" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10826897</id>
    <updated>2015-02-12T07:52:55Z</updated>
    <published>2015-02-12T07:52:15Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Rebecca&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	If CIL is not being introduced until 1st April I cannot see that a valid Notice of Chargeable Development could be submitted before that date.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	I think the test is whether the permitted development i.e. the change of use , has been implemented before that date or not.&amp;nbsp; If it has not been implemented then if the vacancy test is not met the development will be liable for CIL.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; As for what constitutes &amp;nbsp;implementation that is difficult. A building could be converted from offices to flats but not be sold and occupied....or only part of the building converted. We took a pragmatic view and&amp;nbsp; said that if works had started before 1st April 2014 that were definitely linked to the residential conversion e.g. fitting out of bathrooms, acoustic improvements then&amp;nbsp; the building would not be liable for CIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Alison&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-12T07:52:15Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Prior Approvals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10809375" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=10809375</id>
    <updated>2015-02-10T16:02:20Z</updated>
    <published>2015-02-10T16:02:20Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Hello&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	We are introducing our CIl from 1st April 2015.&amp;nbsp;My understanding is&amp;nbsp;that prior approvals fall under a general consent (Reg 5) and therefore their date that first permits development is the day on which the charging authority receives a notice of chargeable development (Regs 7 &amp;amp; 64). Is is correct to say that for prior approvals being submitted right now, if they provide a valid notice of chargeable development prior to 01/04/2015 i.e. before our charging schedule comes in, they will not have to pay CIL? Because there were no relevant rates at the date that first permits development...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Thanks, Rebecca.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-10T16:02:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
