<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>CIL - s73 Abatement</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1360830821" />
  <subtitle>CIL - s73 Abatement</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1360830821</id>
  <updated>2026-04-20T10:24:49Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-20T10:24:49Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: CIL - s73 Abatement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1361344001" />
    <author>
      <name>Suzanne Boughay</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1361344001</id>
    <updated>2026-02-19T09:22:18Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-19T09:22:18Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Hello Claire,&amp;nbsp;

Thank you for providing clarity on Legislation, it has been most helpful.

&amp;nbsp;

Kind regards

Suzanne</summary>
    <dc:creator>Suzanne Boughay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-19T09:22:18Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: CIL - s73 Abatement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1361311410" />
    <author>
      <name>Claire Woods</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1361311410</id>
    <updated>2026-02-19T08:24:27Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-19T08:24:27Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hi Suzanne,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You are quoting the legislation for 74B Abatement: implementation of a diffierent planning permission, but S73 applications come under 74A Abatement: section 73 applications which does not state that 75 does not apply.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regulation 75 specifically states in paragraph 4 that the interest applied to overpayments in paragraph 3 does not apply to overpayments that result from a S73 application.&amp;nbsp; Therefore, implying that overpayment for S73 should be refunded but without interest.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have refunded overpayments resulting from S73 applications, but not refunded applications where a different planning permission is implemented.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Kind regards&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Claire&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Claire Woods</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-19T08:24:27Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>CIL - s73 Abatement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1360830820" />
    <author>
      <name>Suzanne Boughay</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1360830820</id>
    <updated>2026-02-18T16:19:48Z</updated>
    <published>2026-02-18T16:19:48Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp; we have just approved a s73 in which the abatement (credit) is larger than the new CIL charge.&amp;nbsp; The developer has paid the full CIL liability on the original development and applied for abatement.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have been advised that some LA's refund the excess and some dont!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Legislation states:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(14)&amp;nbsp;The difference between the amount paid in relation to A and amount due in relation to B after any abatement has been granted under this regulation is not to be treated as an overpayment for the purposes of regulation 75.]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is the general consensus on this please?&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Suzanne Boughay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-02-18T16:19:48Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
