CIL R123 ListCIL R123 Listhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&threadId=148678852026-03-14T02:23:31Z2026-03-14T02:23:31ZRE: CIL R123 ListFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148769332015-06-02T16:40:08Z2015-06-02T16:40:08ZThanks guys...your contributions are are very helpful. Cheers, SimonFormer Member2015-06-02T16:40:08ZRE: CIL R123 ListDaniel Hudsonhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148783182015-06-02T16:29:57Z2015-06-02T16:29:57Z<p>I guess whilst there is nothing in the regs to compel you to stick to the R123 list, ultimately CIL is justified on the basis of there being an identified infrastructure gap to address needs identified in the Local Plan.</p>
<p>If, in practise, most CIL reciepts are spent on items which are not identified as critical infrastructure and do not have a clear relationship with development proposed in the Local Plan, it could call the justification for operating the CIL in the first place into question. It would be open to a developer to challenge the CIL in the courts on the grounds that the entire CIL scheme is no longer justified.</p>
<p> </p>Daniel Hudson2015-06-02T16:29:57ZRE: CIL R123 ListFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148764472015-06-02T16:20:16Z2015-06-02T16:20:16ZThere is such an expectation amongst those who don't understand the purpose of the Reg.123 list! The Regs. however don't intend that that should be the case.Former Member2015-06-02T16:20:16ZRE: CIL R123 ListFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148756492015-06-02T16:07:41Z2015-06-02T16:07:41ZThanks Tony, would you go further and agree the same applies in terms of the R123 List i.e. "the general expectation is that it would be spent on items on the R123 list"?Former Member2015-06-02T16:07:41ZRE: CIL R123 ListFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148760482015-06-02T15:46:53Z2015-06-02T15:46:53ZDaniel is correct, CIL receipts can be spent on anything that fits within the definition of infrastructure. The general expectation however is that it would be spent on items that appear on the Infrastructure Delivery Plan.Former Member2015-06-02T15:46:53ZRE: CIL R123 ListFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148746552015-06-02T15:01:39Z2015-06-02T15:01:26ZThanks Daniel that is useful, does anybody have a different view?Former Member2015-06-02T15:01:26ZRE: CIL R123 ListDaniel Hudsonhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148718292015-06-02T14:11:46Z2015-06-02T14:11:46Z<p>My understanding is that provided any spending falls within the definition of infrastructure within the regs, you are not bound by the R123 list. The primary purpose of the R123 list is to identify those items for which S106 agreements will not be sought.</p>Daniel Hudson2015-06-02T14:11:46ZCIL R123 ListFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=148678842015-06-02T11:51:16Z2015-06-02T11:50:48Z<p>I have always assumed that one can only spend CIL money on items already on the R123 List. This isn't a major issue in many respects given one can add to or amend the list relatively quickly and easily...however, is it strictly true that it has to be on the list in order to spend CIL money on it? Is it explicitly set out anywhere...?</p>
<p>Thanks, Simon</p>Former Member2015-06-02T11:50:48Z