<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy (Post NPPF 2018)</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=169955902" />
  <subtitle>Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy (Post NPPF 2018)</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=169955902</id>
  <updated>2026-05-14T08:21:40Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-14T08:21:40Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy (Post NPPF 2018)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=169955901" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=169955901</id>
    <updated>2019-01-22T15:22:16Z</updated>
    <published>2019-01-22T12:05:34Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Following the revision of the NPPF in July&amp;nbsp; 2018&amp;nbsp;are other LPA's still including a specific "Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy" within their new/revised Local Plans? Recent research has seen a split in LPA's including the once standard wording which came about in 2012.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The policy raises a major issues&amp;nbsp;where there are&amp;nbsp;already&amp;nbsp;potential key conflicts with polices (highways/environmental etc), and the proposal is found to be in accordance with the development due to&amp;nbsp;out of date policies/no five year housing land supply.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How are other areas looking to deal with this?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-22T12:05:34Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
