<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Planning Guarantee</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=18956072" />
  <subtitle>Planning Guarantee</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=18956072</id>
  <updated>2026-03-10T06:40:15Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-03-10T06:40:15Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Planning Guarantee</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=18956071" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=18956071</id>
    <updated>2016-03-15T12:35:04Z</updated>
    <published>2016-03-15T12:35:04Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Planning Guarantee:&amp;nbsp; I have been contacted by an LPA who has been asked for a return of their fee by an applicant for an EIA development&amp;nbsp; who was held up in their determination by the delay in the applicant submitting supplementary EIA analysis subsequent to their amendment of the proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
I am interested to hear from anyone who has had experience of the planning guarantee biting them. Not looking for costs or fine detail , but a short explanation of what the problem was would be helpful.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-15T12:35:04Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
