Previous Developed Land on Green BeltPrevious Developed Land on Green Belthttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&threadId=1951934122026-07-16T19:52:51Z2026-07-16T19:52:51ZPrevious Developed Land on Green BeltFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=1951934112019-05-02T12:02:17Z2019-05-02T11:49:53Z<p>The latest NPPF para 145 States:</p>
<p>limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of
previously developed <br> land, whether redundant or in continuing use
(excluding temporary buildings), <br> which would:<br> ‒ not have a
greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the <br>
existing development; or<br> ‒ not cause substantial harm to the
openness of the Green Belt, where the <br> development would re-use
previously developed land and contribute to <br> meeting an identified
affordable housing need within the area of the local <br> planning authority.</p>
<p>Am I reasonable to say "not cause substantial harm" will be
only applicable to affordable housing development? Other development
will still need to satisfy "not greater impact"? If
following the recent court case logic of considering residential
garden outside settlement boundary as PDL, how the "greater"
impact would be accessed? Comparing to the volumn of the existing
outbuilding? What if there is no outbuilding?</p>
<p> </p>Former Member2019-05-02T11:49:53Z