Biodiversity metric v3.1Biodiversity metric v3.1https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&threadId=6803156132026-03-11T01:33:17Z2026-03-11T01:33:17ZBiodiversity metric v3.1Former Memberhttps://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=6803156122022-07-05T07:59:33Z2022-07-04T22:00:17Z<p>I am trying to understand when more distant off site provision of
biodiversity units is penalised by the 'spatial risk multiplier' in
metric 3.1. I have read Biodiversity metric 3.1 User Guide (para 5.53
and Table 5-7) but still not clear! </p>
<p>In the scenarios below, which multiplier (1, 0.75 or 0.5) would apply?</p>
<p>a) off site provision is in the same LPA as development site AND in
the same National Character Area (NCA)</p>
<p>b) off site provision is in a neighbouring LPA to development
site AND is in a neighbouring NCA</p>
<p>c) off site provision is in the same LPA as development site BUT is
in a neighbouring NCA</p>
<p>d) off site provision is in a neighbouring LPA to development site
BUT in the same NCA</p>
<p>e) off site provision is in the same LPA as development site BUT is
in a beyond neighbouring NCA </p>
<p>f) off site provision is in a beyond neighbouring LPA to development
site BUT is in the same NCA</p>
<p>a = 1, b=0.75, c = ?, d = ?, e= ?, f=?</p>
<p>Some LPAs span numerous National Character Areas (NCAs) (e.g.
Tandridge x4, Waverley x5). </p>Former Member2022-07-04T22:00:17Z