<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Neighbourhood Planning</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=9309000" />
  <subtitle>Neighbourhood Planning</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=9309000</id>
  <updated>2026-03-16T14:54:36Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-03-16T14:54:36Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Neighbourhood Planning</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=9308999" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=9308999</id>
    <updated>2014-10-07T11:58:14Z</updated>
    <published>2014-10-07T11:54:29Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;
	Which policies are strategic in terms of neighbourhood plans?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	What would happen if a LPA stated that all policies in their Local Plan are strategic for the purposes of neighbourhood planning? Would this be accepted or would the&amp;nbsp;Examiner make their own determination regarding which of the policies in the local development plan are strategic using &lt;a href="http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/neighbourhood-planning/the-basic-conditions-that-a-draft-neighbourhood-plan-or-order-must-meet-if-it-is-to-proceed-to-referendum/general-conformity-with-the-strategic-policies-contained-in-the-development-plan/"&gt;this section&lt;/a&gt; in the NPPG?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Do you know of any examples where this has happened? Or, do you know of any examples where the Examiner has disagreed with what the LPA have said are their strategic policies?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	Many thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-07T11:54:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
