<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Minor Material Amendment</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=9638936" />
  <subtitle>Minor Material Amendment</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=9638936</id>
  <updated>2026-05-19T06:45:27Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-05-19T06:45:27Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Minor Material Amendment</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=9638935" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=9638935</id>
    <updated>2014-11-06T08:29:11Z</updated>
    <published>2014-11-06T08:29:11Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Application submitted three weeks ago now for a MMA on&amp;nbsp;a house extension. Applicant checked the NPPG prior to submission which says` on standard application forms` prior to submission and submitted on householder application forms.LPA refused to validate&amp;nbsp; (after 10 days) as not on `&amp;nbsp;variation of condition` forms. My view is it can be on either....but i would be interested to hear what others think. Seems to me to be a storm in a teacup and defeats the objective of `flexible ` planning.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-06T08:29:11Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
