<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>withdrawing and neighbourhood plan and resubmitting</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=114581695" />
  <subtitle>withdrawing and neighbourhood plan and resubmitting</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=114581695</id>
  <updated>2026-07-26T23:23:32Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-26T23:23:32Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>withdrawing and neighbourhood plan and resubmitting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=114581694" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=114581694</id>
    <updated>2018-08-02T11:53:23Z</updated>
    <published>2018-04-13T09:23:45Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Morning all, please does anyone have experience of the above, and specifically, can anyone provide an answer as to which stage a NDP has to go back to if it is to be resubmitted (Reg 16). The specific circumstance we are dealing with is a NDP which passed referendum but then was withdrawn in response to a legal challenge. The ANP has been resubmitted to the Council largely unchanged for Reg 16 consultations but some have suggested it should go back to Reg 14?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If anyone has a similar situation and has a plan that went back to Reg 14 or Reg 16 then it would be good to hear about it, to see if there is any established practice on this.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-13T09:23:45Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
