<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>new designations for non-majors</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=29529095" />
  <subtitle>new designations for non-majors</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=29529095</id>
  <updated>2026-08-12T16:53:09Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-12T16:53:09Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>new designations for non-majors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=29529094" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=29529094</id>
    <updated>2016-12-09T13:08:55Z</updated>
    <published>2016-12-09T13:08:55Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;I am looking at the explaination for how the quality of application will be judged.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can someone confirm that I am on the right track. At the moment&amp;nbsp; we&amp;nbsp;look at the number of appeal desisions received in a quarter and the number of applications determined in that quarter to calculate our internal statistics for appeals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As I understand the quality explaination we will look at the decsions made in a particular 2 year period, then 9 months later, look to see which of those applications appealed (other than about conditions) the calculation is then about no more than 10% of the appeals allowed of those applications determined in the 2 year period.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Have I got that right?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-09T13:08:55Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
