<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>% Affordable Bedrooms Policy</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=33271638" />
  <subtitle>% Affordable Bedrooms Policy</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=33271638</id>
  <updated>2026-07-27T09:04:56Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-27T09:04:56Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>% Affordable Bedrooms Policy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=33271637" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=33271637</id>
    <updated>2017-05-15T13:41:34Z</updated>
    <published>2017-05-15T13:37:07Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Has anybody gone down the path of an affordable no of bedrooms policy?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We are contemplating using bedrooms rather than units to get around tricky viability arguments which we always lose. It would&amp;nbsp;give us an element of flexibility and ensure that we get larger family housing not 2 bed flats i.e. we would ask for 40% of bedrooms per development.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A possible downside would be developers 'hiding' bedrooms i.e. making huge bedrooms that could later be partitioned or having offices or playrooms instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1) Has anyone else chosen&amp;nbsp;to seek a % of bedrooms on a development?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2) Can anyone think of any other possible downsides....?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks in advance&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-15T13:37:07Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
