<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>When is a new planning unit created and does this effect immunity ?</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=428761577" />
  <subtitle>When is a new planning unit created and does this effect immunity ?</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=428761577</id>
  <updated>2026-08-03T06:31:46Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-03T06:31:46Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>When is a new planning unit created and does this effect immunity ?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=428761576" />
    <author>
      <name>Mark Lane</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=428761576</id>
    <updated>2021-02-24T15:54:29Z</updated>
    <published>2021-02-24T14:27:51Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;I have been an enforcement officer for 16 years but as the saying
  goes you learn something new every day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I served an enforcement notice on land that was formally within the
  red line of a quarry permission but had a dwelling built on it in the
  1920's. In 2011 the quarry was sold to another operator and the land
  with the house on was retained by the former quarry owners, this land
  was registered at that point separating it from the quarry, this
  parcel of land formed the red line of the enforcement notice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Up until 2003 the land with the house was self contained screened
  from the quarry by trees and lawn was laid. In 2003 bays were
  constructed and these were used to store &amp;quot;won&amp;quot; mineral from
  either the quarry or by importation, there may have been some small
  scale processing by grading taking place but on a small possibly
  ancillary scale. Post 2011 the site was used increasingly used to
  process construction and demolition material for resale as reclaimed aggregate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This was investigated by my predecessor and I served an
  enforcement  notice in 2018. The landowner made a CLUED application to
  the district and appealed my notice (as a county matter) then when the
  CLUED was refused appealed that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have received the result of the CLUED appeal which has granted an
  LDC based on the fact that importation storage and processing had
  taken place from, in the inspectors opinion, no later than 2005 and
  therefore a certificate should be granted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fact the inspector agrees that a new planing unit was created in
  2011 but this has not created a new chapter in the planing history has
  been a learning experience. I presume as there has not been any new
  planing permissions on the land since 2011 Pioneer Aggregates would
  not apply ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any thoughts ?? &lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Mark Lane</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-02-24T14:27:51Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
