Poorly drafted planning conditionsPoorly drafted planning conditionshttps://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&threadId=62235812026-07-27T05:18:07Z2026-07-27T05:18:07ZPoorly drafted planning conditionsFormer Memberhttps://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=62235802014-01-07T23:12:23Z2014-01-07T23:12:23Z<p style="margin-left: 5px; font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-variant: normal; line-height: 19px; background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);"> Hello. I'm looking for the best example of a poorly drafted planning condition, one that fails any of the tests in the Circular, but particularly precison and enforceability! My favourite is still probably "The site shall be kept in a neat and tidy condition to the satisfaction of the Council"! I'm sure you can do better. Feel free to post here, or e-mail me directly at mh@mhplanning.co.uk</p> <p style="margin-left: 5px; font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-variant: normal; line-height: 19px; background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);"> Regards, Mike Hyde</p>Former Member2014-01-07T23:12:23Z