<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Best practice on the use (or not) of planning conditions</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=6236566" />
  <subtitle>Best practice on the use (or not) of planning conditions</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=6236566</id>
  <updated>2026-07-27T05:16:38Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-27T05:16:38Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Best practice on the use (or not) of planning conditions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=6236587" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=6236587</id>
    <updated>2013-09-24T11:57:42Z</updated>
    <published>2013-09-24T11:57:42Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt; Hi Richard, we did ours at the back end of last year - they are on our &lt;a href="http://www.bristol.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/planning_and_building_regulations/planning_applications_and_process/planning_advice_and_guidance/Standard%20planning%20conditions%20-%20updated%204%20December%202012.pdf" onclick="_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Document Asset', 'Download', '']);"&gt;web site&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; We also have recently redone our processes about getting conditions approved to respond to concerns raised by our regular users.&amp;nbsp; Happy to share both.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-24T11:57:42Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Best practice on the use (or not) of planning conditions</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=6236565" />
    <author>
      <name>Richard Crawley</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/cy/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=6236565</id>
    <updated>2013-09-16T17:06:51Z</updated>
    <published>2013-09-16T17:06:51Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Has anyone recently overhauled their approach to conditions ?&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; It's an area we've not touched on for many years, and it may be useful to have a recap on what good looks like these days.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Obviously, to chime with the mood of the moment, we're looking at something simple and proportionate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Alternatively you may disagree and argue that conditions are so tied in with local policy that it wouldn't make sense for a more generic approach.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt; Any thoughts ? Anyone feel like showing off their hard work ?&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Richard Crawley</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-16T17:06:51Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
