<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1230956052" />
  <subtitle>Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1230956052</id>
  <updated>2026-08-12T14:35:52Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-12T14:35:52Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1235398918" />
    <author>
      <name>Andy Duncan</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1235398918</id>
    <updated>2025-09-01T11:54:02Z</updated>
    <published>2025-09-01T11:54:02Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thanks for replies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We've also taken some legal advice and the view is that the neighbourhood CIL should go to the parish where the development currently sits, eg if the parish boundary changes then any CIL payments after that date go to the new parish. Hopefully this helps others in this situation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also noted about using AI. I've found it useful in some instances but also prone to false detail, eg quoting the wrong paragraph of the NPPF, or just being wrong or contradictory. Agree it needs to be used with caution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Andy Duncan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-01T11:54:02Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1233005377" />
    <author>
      <name>Andrew Chalmers</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1233005377</id>
    <updated>2025-08-26T09:10:31Z</updated>
    <published>2025-08-26T09:10:31Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;And a final reminder to self and others to treat google AI searches with caution - as this shows it simply has come up with 2 opposing scenarios - and while useful, certainly I've found in a number of cases the results are simply wrong.&amp;nbsp; Unless it points explicitly to current legislation or regulations or recect planning I treat it with care.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Chalmers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-26T09:10:31Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1233004216" />
    <author>
      <name>Andrew Chalmers</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1233004216</id>
    <updated>2025-08-26T09:12:08Z</updated>
    <published>2025-08-26T09:07:38Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;No experience in this field but remember the neighbourhood portion is to support the development of the area generally not to mitigate specific impacts from a particular development.&amp;nbsp; In this sense CIL has always fundamentally differed from S106 contributions - and monies can be spent on virtually anything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I wonder if parish A already has an expectation of how it would have spent&amp;nbsp;the money which will have already been collected at commencement and&amp;nbsp;legitimately been for its area until the boundary is formally changed.&amp;nbsp; Without knowing the amount it is difficult to establish whether parish A will be significantly disadvantaged.&amp;nbsp; Could some kind of transfer be arranged.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do the two parishes have different infrastructure needs - which ones would be best supported maybe?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Chalmers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-26T09:07:38Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1231210692" />
    <author>
      <name>Rick Long</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1231210692</id>
    <updated>2025-08-21T07:34:03Z</updated>
    <published>2025-08-21T07:34:03Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Given that the legislation did not anticipate a scenario such as this, I would be inclined to rely on the basic&amp;nbsp;principle of the neighbourhood fund which is to mitigate or compensate for the impacts of development on a local area. This would suggest that&amp;nbsp;the CIL should be paid to the parish council where the development is located.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Rick Long</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-21T07:34:03Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Parish boundary change: which parish gets the CIL?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1230956051" />
    <author>
      <name>Andy Duncan</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1230956051</id>
    <updated>2025-08-20T14:23:55Z</updated>
    <published>2025-08-20T14:23:54Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;We have a development site within &lt;b&gt;Parish A.&lt;/b&gt; It has planning permission and has commenced. &lt;b&gt;Parish B&lt;/b&gt; wants to change the parish boundary to move the development site into their parish, as it is closer geographically to the core settlement in &lt;b&gt;Parish B.&lt;/b&gt; If the boundary change is approved, which parish gets the neighbourhood portion of CIL from the development, if any future CIL payments are due from the development? If the total CIL due from the development has been paid, would &lt;b&gt;Parish B&lt;/b&gt; be able to make any claim on the neighbourhood portion already passed to &lt;b&gt;Parish A?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;I can’t find anything in the CIL regs on this issue, the closest being that the planning permission date is the relevant date for whether the 25% payment for a having neighbourhood plan in place applies for a parish. Following the same logic, the parish boundary as it was when permission was first granted determines which parish subsequently gets the CIL. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;The PPG is also silent, it includes cases where a development straddles a parish boundary but not where the boundary changes. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;Goggle has provided two opposing views on this question, below. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;A development was within &lt;b&gt;Parish A&lt;/b&gt; when the CIL charge notice was issued. Six months later, boundary changes shift it into &lt;b&gt;Parish B&lt;/b&gt;. All CIL payments linked to that development remain payable to &lt;b&gt;Parish A&lt;/b&gt; (because liability is locked&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Cambria Math&amp;quot;,serif"&gt;‐&lt;/span&gt;in at charge notice date).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;Or&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;The district council is required to pay the neighbourhood proportion of CIL to the parish council where the CIL-liable development is located. If the location of a CIL-liable development changes from &lt;b&gt;Parish A&lt;/b&gt; to &lt;b&gt;Parish B&lt;/b&gt; as a result of parish boundary changes, subsequent payments of the neighbourhood proportion of CIL (including any remaining payments in a series of instalments) will be paid to &lt;b&gt;Parish B.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height:107%"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif"&gt;Any views on this scenario would be most helpful. Thanks. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-bottom:11px"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Andy Duncan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-08-20T14:23:54Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
