<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>failure to amend a major planning application</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1245139778" />
  <subtitle>failure to amend a major planning application</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1245139778</id>
  <updated>2026-08-12T15:48:05Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-12T15:48:05Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: failure to amend a major planning application</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1246615361" />
    <author>
      <name>Stuart Cain</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1246615361</id>
    <updated>2025-09-29T11:19:36Z</updated>
    <published>2025-09-29T11:19:36Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;I would echo this.&amp;nbsp; Let the planners/enforcement sort the planning out.&amp;nbsp; Then&amp;nbsp;issue the correct CIL notices based the approved applications.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Stuart Cain</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-29T11:19:36Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: failure to amend a major planning application</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1246608209" />
    <author>
      <name>Sulina Tallack</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1246608209</id>
    <updated>2025-09-29T11:17:05Z</updated>
    <published>2025-09-29T11:17:05Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;My understanding is that you carry pn with CIL&amp;nbsp;under the application that they have told you that they have commenced and report the breach to enforcement/planners.&amp;nbsp; They would then (I would think) be expected to regularise via a S73 and then the Regs specify processes for this.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Sulina Tallack</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-29T11:17:05Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>failure to amend a major planning application</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1245139777" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1245139777</id>
    <updated>2025-09-25T12:45:20Z</updated>
    <published>2025-09-25T12:45:20Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hi&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If a major planning application was built out different to the approved plans and was only discovered by a inpromtu visit how would this affect the CIl.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;it is a phased scheme and the part in question was cil liable due to the sq feet but now its residential with multiple units. They have already paid for this part of the phased development. Would they need to just pay any difference&amp;nbsp;with a surcharge on an amended liability notice or would you make them pay again on a new scheme as the new units are finished and be on the market soon or both?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I couldnt find in the cil regs anything about failure to submit a section 73 (an amended scheme).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-09-25T12:45:20Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
