<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>BNG - subject to VAT?</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1447690040" />
  <subtitle>BNG - subject to VAT?</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=1447690040</id>
  <updated>2026-07-26T10:08:25Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-26T10:08:25Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: BNG - subject to VAT?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1450447739" />
    <author>
      <name>Tim Burkinshaw</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1450447739</id>
    <updated>2026-07-06T08:35:29Z</updated>
    <published>2026-07-06T08:35:29Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In North Yorkshire our finance bods reached a conclusion that application fees and monitoring fees for Habitat Banks that we agree to regulate are VAT-able, as they are a discretionary service, which customer could get from elsewhere and thus it would be anti-competitive to undercut the market by offering without VAT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We don't yet have any council owned HBs, so have not crossed that bridge yet.... But I would imagine the same reasoning applies that its anti-competitive if we offer discounted Units so we should add VAT to the BUs we sell.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In contrast, for BNG Monitoring fees that we charge developers in a Dev Management scenario (by mechanism of a s106 or a UU tied to the permission) then these can be zero VAT as these are to defray our costs in monitoring BNG associated with the permission - whether on-site or a bespoke offsite solution on developer's own land where the s106 includes this land.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Where a developer has bought BUs from a third party habitat bank, obviously there is another organisation, the RB, doing the monitoring and charging their fees. So we can't charge them again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Tim Burkinshaw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-06T08:35:29Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: BNG - subject to VAT?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1450403863" />
    <author>
      <name>Louise Weaver</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1450403863</id>
    <updated>2026-07-06T07:11:22Z</updated>
    <published>2026-07-06T07:11:22Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hi Suzanne&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I do not see that the Council itself is providing any sort of different service for the monitoring of S106 as it does with BNG, there is a VAT able product for BNG but the Council itself is providing the same function. I would be interested to know how your finance team have reached this conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Would be interested to know it the outcome of this conversation.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Louise Weaver</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-06T07:11:22Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>BNG - subject to VAT?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1447690039" />
    <author>
      <name>Suzanne Boughay</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=1447690039</id>
    <updated>2026-07-01T14:03:31Z</updated>
    <published>2026-07-01T14:03:30Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Our finance team have recently advised that all financial BNG contributions secured through a s106 agreement are liable for VAT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The view that we have used to date is that a BNG financial contribution paid to the local authority under a s106 agreement is generally treated as a statutory planning obligation and is typically outside the scope of VAT, BUT, the purchase of BNG units/credits is often VATable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The suggestion is that we now revisit historic BNG contributions secured through s106 agreements and reissue demand notices to the developer with added VAT.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It would be helpful to know how other local authorities treat the BNG contributions secured through a s106 agreement in relation to VAT.&amp;nbsp; Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Suzanne Boughay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-07-01T14:03:30Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
