<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Housing Land Supply in Neighbourhood Plan areas</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=341680260" />
  <subtitle>Housing Land Supply in Neighbourhood Plan areas</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=341680260</id>
  <updated>2026-08-12T16:56:55Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-12T16:56:55Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Housing Land Supply in Neighbourhood Plan areas</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=341680259" />
    <author>
      <name>richard white</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=341680259</id>
    <updated>2020-07-29T09:55:48Z</updated>
    <published>2020-07-29T09:49:32Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;In case there is any doubt, PINs have confirmed (via a consent order)
  that the correct approach to NPPF 14(c) is to determine whether an LPA
  has &amp;quot;three-years' worth of deliverable housing sites as assessed
  against its five-year housing requirement figure&amp;quot; rather than
  assessing the amount of housing deliverable within 3 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deliverable has its normal meaning &amp;quot;To be considered
  deliverable, sites for housing should be available now, offer a
  suitable location for development now, and be achievable with a
  realistic prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within 5 years.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The correct approach is therefore to measure deliverable supply
  against the five year target - exactly as per an assessment of five
  year supply - but the threshold for passing the test is 3 years' worth
  (60%) not 5 years' worth (100%)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well done East Cambs!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sources:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
  &lt;a href="https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/planning/401-planning-news/44463-district-council-wins-legal-battle-after-planning-inspector-miscalculated-its-housing-land-supply"&gt;https://www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/planning/401-planning-news/44463-district-council-wins-legal-battle-after-planning-inspector-miscalculated-its-housing-land-supply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
  &lt;a href="https://pa.eastcambs.gov.uk/online-applications/files/9270EF26C28EBA985660EECA4D12BCA3/pdf/18_01703_OUT-Consent_Order-1132346.pdf"&gt;https://pa.eastcambs.gov.uk/online-applications/files/9270EF26C28EBA985660EECA4D12BCA3/pdf/18_01703_OUT-Consent_Order-1132346.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
  &lt;a href="https://acp.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/ViewCase.aspx?CaseID=3227639&amp;CoID=0"&gt;https://acp.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/ViewCase.aspx?CaseID=3227639&amp;amp;CoID=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>richard white</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-07-29T09:49:32Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
