Use Class E / Viability / Plan MakingUse Class E / Viability / Plan Makinghttps://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&threadId=5238053712026-08-12T15:48:12Z2026-08-12T15:48:12ZUse Class E / Viability / Plan MakingMartin Hutchingshttps://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&messageId=5238053702021-10-01T09:25:05Z2021-09-09T17:26:45Z<p>
<span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri , sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: Arial , sans-serif;">I am working with a
number of councils that are in the process of getting their site
allocations plan ready for a Reg 19 consultation and doing a
viability assessment as part of the evidence base. They are
pondering how the new class E should be treated in the
assessment – some are suggesting specific uses in their plan and
will try to use conditions to pin them down when the
applications come in.</span>
</span>
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri , sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: Arial , sans-serif;">I'm not sure about
this so wanted to ask how are others factoring Class E into
their assumptions? Do assessments just continue to be undertaken
as they've always been? If so, is this potentially less
favourable towards the potential value of a development now that
future uses are so flexible? </span>
</span>
</span>
</p>
<p>
<span style="font-size: 11.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri , sans-serif;"> </span>
</span>
</p>Martin Hutchings2021-09-09T17:26:45Z