<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Climate/sustainability checklists in assessing development proposals</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=812507889" />
  <subtitle>Climate/sustainability checklists in assessing development proposals</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=812507889</id>
  <updated>2026-08-12T16:53:22Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-08-12T16:53:22Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Climate/sustainability checklists in assessing development proposals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=812507888" />
    <author>
      <name>Former Member</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=812507888</id>
    <updated>2023-02-21T15:23:34Z</updated>
    <published>2023-02-21T15:23:33Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Hi. Has anyone used a climate impacts checklist (or similar sustainability checklist) to assess development proposals? We're aware a number of councils use checklists/frameworks to collect information about the sustainability of a proposal, but does anyone use the responses to inform&amp;nbsp;negotiations with developers and/or in decision making? Do they actually&amp;nbsp;help to bring about more climate-friendly development? Does anyone set a requirement for a checklist directly in the policy (detailing how responses&amp;nbsp;will be used)? They often seem to form part of validation requirements, rather than being explicitly included&amp;nbsp;in local policy.&amp;nbsp; Just interested in anyone's 'practical' experience of them.&amp;nbsp; Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Former Member</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-21T15:23:33Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
