<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
  <link rel="self" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=923687335" />
  <subtitle>Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</subtitle>
  <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=53683759&amp;threadId=923687335</id>
  <updated>2026-07-26T06:37:20Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-07-26T06:37:20Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=935506742" />
    <author>
      <name>richard white</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=935506742</id>
    <updated>2023-11-13T13:05:42Z</updated>
    <published>2023-11-13T13:05:42Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;And for a little light relief, would this count as 'self build' or 'out of the box'?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://youtube.com/shorts/X0xMTsArEIc?si=0YpPzIWN_LQBmiQW"&gt;https://youtube.com/shorts/X0xMTsArEIc?si=0YpPzIWN_LQBmiQW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>richard white</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-13T13:05:42Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=932142312" />
    <author>
      <name>richard white</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=932142312</id>
    <updated>2023-11-06T09:22:49Z</updated>
    <published>2023-11-06T09:22:18Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;But then I remember my parents' experience when they retired and purchased a new park home. The basic shell was 'off the shelf' but everything else - the number and position of internal walls, the plumbing and heating layout, lighting, flooring, fit and finish was all custom spec. But then many other park homes - even bought new - are entirely off the shelf from the manufacterer.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>richard white</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-06T09:22:18Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=932112824" />
    <author>
      <name>Mary Elkington</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=932112824</id>
    <updated>2023-11-06T08:30:40Z</updated>
    <published>2023-11-06T08:30:39Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p style="margin-left:40px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,sans-serif"&gt;I think not. The NPPG is clear that:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-left:80px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:12.0pt"&gt;&lt;span style="background:white"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Arial&amp;quot;,sans-serif"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#0b0c0c"&gt;Off-plan housing, homes purchased at the plan stage prior to construction and without input into the design and layout from the buyer, are not considered to meet the definition of self-build and custom housing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-top:7px; margin-bottom:11px; margin-left:40px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,sans-serif"&gt;So I can’t see how a Caravan could possibly count. &amp;nbsp;There is a natural language definition of self build where the occupant is &lt;i&gt;substantially involved in construction of the dwelling&lt;/i&gt; – but again just decking &amp;amp; landscaping etc wouldn’t count.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-top:7px; margin-bottom:11px; margin-left:40px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,sans-serif"&gt;The reference to containers is presumably from Grand Designs – Using container ‘panels’ as part of a construction is not the same as living in a container and calling it a self build.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p style="margin-top:7px; margin-bottom:11px; margin-left:40px"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:11pt"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,sans-serif"&gt;The reference to &lt;b&gt;temporary buildings&lt;/b&gt; seems very tenuous – I assume you’re thinking of a rural workers self build dwelling with a reinstatement clause (again from the old GD episode for woodland worker).&amp;nbsp; This would be a very rare case, and self build would need to be substantiated via the s106 that secures the reinstatement.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Mary Elkington</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-11-06T08:30:39Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=929446190" />
    <author>
      <name>Catherine Denning-Johnson</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=929446190</id>
    <updated>2023-10-31T07:15:19Z</updated>
    <published>2023-10-31T07:15:19Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;It's a puzzle isn't it.&amp;nbsp; As self build can include modular and temporary builds (eg, shipping container conversions), I'd suggest logic dictates yes.&amp;nbsp; But have not yet come across confirmation.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Catherine Denning-Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-31T07:15:19Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RE: Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=924637625" />
    <author>
      <name>richard white</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=924637625</id>
    <updated>2023-10-20T12:00:24Z</updated>
    <published>2023-10-20T12:00:24Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;You might be stretching the point, but I think you're right that there is nothing in the regs to exclude caravans per se&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But if the only element of self build was e.g. laying a slab and parking a caravan on it, and the caravan itself is a standard mass market van, is that really self build?&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>richard white</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-20T12:00:24Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Self-build and permanent traveller pitches</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=923687334" />
    <author>
      <name>Catherine Denning-Johnson</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://khub.net/fr/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=53683759&amp;messageId=923687334</id>
    <updated>2023-10-18T12:50:53Z</updated>
    <published>2023-10-18T12:50:52Z</published>
    <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Query: should proposals to develop a permanent traveller pitch also be treated as self build proposals when applying planning policies and subsequently monitoring if granted and built out? I can't find anything in the Regs to suggest they should not be.&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
    <dc:creator>Catherine Denning-Johnson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-18T12:50:52Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>
