inconsistent plans - Public forum - Planning Advisory Service (PAS)
inconsistent plans
Kevin Dodd, modified 7 Years ago.
inconsistent plans
New Member Posts: 4 Join Date: 19/09/16 Recent PostsYes, in that scenario it's effectively approved either way, because it would be impossible to successfully take enforcement action. I can't imagine any circumstance in which the council would try to tell you otherwise, but if you wanted to be really really risk averse you could check with them that they won't be silly about it.
(I think there would be significantly more risk if it was on the floorplans but not the elevations, because it would not be fully 'described'.)
Kevin Dodd, modified 7 Years ago.
RE: inconsistent plans
New Member Posts: 4 Join Date: 19/09/16 Recent Posts
Thanks for the response, it is actually the other way, apologies. It's a door on the floor plan but not the elevation. As such given your comments would you still think it is approved either way. It would be nice to have the door which will act more of a window to let light in but I had only looked at the elevations in depth so it is something I had not bargained for. When you mention risk are you referring to potential enforcement action given its not on the elevations. I note a 1:20 window and door design must be provided as a condition so assume will be picked up then also.