Planning Advisory Service (PAS) Logo
Planning Advisory Service (PAS)
Open group | Started - July 2012 | Last activity - This week

Commencement of Development

Former Member, modified 7 Years ago.

Commencement of Development

I have a strange one and not one that I am familiar with !  Planning permission granted for a Natural Burial Ground for personal use only and has a three year time limit condition - with no plans of making use of the plot within the next three years how would you keep the permission 'alive'?  Its been suggested to fence off the area however I doubt that will comply with the definition of commencement.  The land will not be consecreated.   

Any suggestions?

Former Member, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

All kinds of dark humour opportunities here, but I'll resist. A three year time limit for a personal grave is a bit morbid though. 

But anyway, surely you just discharge any pre start conditions and dig a grave? Then fill it back in for safety reasons, I should think. 

Frankly, even if someone was buried there after the pp expired I'd be amazed if the LPA tried to enforce. An enforcement notice requiring exhumation on a site previously given pp for burials? Or turning up at the funeral with a stop notice? Can't see it. TBH I wonder whether it actually needed planning permission in the first place if it's just for personal use. 

 

Former Member, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

John there are no pre commencement conditions just a couple of compliance conditions.  Digging the grave and back filling was my first through but seems a pointless excercise.  Also considered fencing the area off but the legislation requires 'Material Development' to have happened and given the fence would be PD didn't think that would give the commencement.

I tend to agree with your comments on the Enforcement and did have a humourous converstation with an Enforcement Officer on this - I'm also wondering if planning permission was needed as the change of use involves underground land and other than a head stone there would be no over ground work - however that may be a simplistic view!

thumbnail
Andrew Muir, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

New Member Posts: 11 Join Date: 10/11/15 Recent Posts
I will also resist killing this thread with bad humour, however, I thought planning related to matters in on over and under ground. But agree dig the hole fill it in. At least when the person does eventually die it will be easier to dig the hole.
Jo Birkin, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

New Member Posts: 7 Join Date: 04/03/13 Recent Posts

Digging the hole and filling back in afterwards would seem to constitute a "material operation" for the purposes of commencement of development

High Peak Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Environment and Courtdale Developments [1980] and

 Riordan Communications Ltd v South Bucks District Council [1999]

The owner could be advised to document the process with photographs, and lodge copies of them with the Council for future reference.

 

Dead funny post!! (Sorry I couldn't resist!)

 

 

Former Member, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

I dont disagree with anything that has been said to date, regarding a material start. However, and it has been touched upon already, did the works actually involve 'development' ? Surely that was the starting point. If i dug a hole in my back garden, or if i had an orchard etc, 3 feet wide and 8 feet in length and 6 feet deep, would any sane planning officer say i had undetaken development ? I f i then stuck my dog or my mother in it, ( sic) does that constitute development? I might be inclined to re- read Sec 55 of the Act.

 

 

Former Member, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

Was the application submitted on the basis of a material change of use of land, or operational development in, on, over or under land?  I once got permission for a private burial ground, and it was submitted on the basis of the former, not the latter.  This is important because S56 says the development of land shall be taken to be initiated—

(a)if the development consists of the carrying out of operations, at the time when those operations are begun;

(b)if the development consists of a change in use, at the time when the new use is instituted;

(c)if the development consists both of the carrying out of operations and of a change in use, at the earlier of the times mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b).

Even if it were the latter, would digging a hole and then filling it in again be enough.  S56(4)(b) says the digging of a trench which is to contain the foundations, or part of the foundations, of a building.  This would thus not apply?

Former Member, modified 7 Years ago.

RE: Commencement of Development

Thank you all for your comments - all have been interesting and pretty much where I had got myself to.  The application was for a change of use of land therefore I doubt digging the hole would be enough as the legislation states 'material development'.  I think I am coming to the conclusion that the applicant needs to reapply in the next year excercising the right to a free go and requesting an extended time limit to implement the consent....seems the most sensible approach.....as the applicant said  he has no plans of using the permission in the next three years!