Hello,
I have the following scenario and would appreciate your thoughts.
An applicant has queried whether he would qualify for a self-build
extension exemption for an extension on a house he has bought to
refurbish and live in thereafter. He does not currently live in the
house and has advised that it is not in a habitable state.
I advised that as he does not satisfy clause (b) below, I would not
be able to grant the exemption.
42A.—(1) Subject to paragraphs (5) and (6), a person (P) is exempt
from liability to pay CIL in respect of
development if—
(a) P
owns a material interest in a dwelling (“main dwelling”);
(b) P
occupies the main dwelling as P’s sole or main residence; and
(c)
the development is a residential annex or a residential extension.
He has queried this and stated that the CIL regulations do not take
account of people in his situation. Has anyone else had this scenario
and how have you dealt with it?
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks
Evelyn
