We have noticed an increasing number of applications for large HMOs
(more than 6 people, Sui Generis) and are getting an increasing number
of objections from residents and communities. We deal with these
applications based on our up to date plan policies and the NPPF.
We are now considering the possibility of using Article 4 Direction
to require planning applications for the C4 (3-6 person HMOs).
I was interested in whether any other authorities have used Article 4
to control small HMOs and how successful it has been. What is the
balance of increased workload against the actual ability to have
robust decision making control? Have to got HMO specific policies to refer to?
On the large HMOs the obvious considerations are amenity and
character where HMOs (particularly proliferation) might affect the
character of an area. I guess this may be more difficult to measure
for smaller HMOs where maybe 3 or 4 people might be living as an
unrelated household.
It is a difficult area because as simply a use, they are a
residential use, so in a residential area it is sometimes difficult to
differentiate between a small HMO and a household with a large family
living in it where several people may have cars and come and go about
their business etc.
I think the representations we are getting is that certain areas are
becoming intensified with so many HMOs it is affecting the character
of the area and taking up what could be family homes. The issue of
need for family homes and lack of control to keep houses as family
accommodation is one key point.
If anyone has any experience and/or is using Article 4 for small HMOs
I'd be grateful for some insight into how successful you think it is.
Thanks
Jon
