A bunch of new analysis posted in one go to save space, all on transport, telecoms and minerals Key changes summary: much more limited scope to refuse schemes with negative transport impact Developers will find it much harder to get through schemes with low parking, one exception to the pro-developer thrust. More permissive regime for minerals, especially open cast, the current policy of being able to set a local ban ended. The 'prudent use of resources' tests ended, seems to promote deliberately unsustainable development. I know one or two people cant get access to external wordpress sites, id post words docs and tables on here if PAS had a more modern forum system, but I cant, until then people can email me for copies if firewalled andrew.lainton@btopenworld.com https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/national-planning-policy-framework-forensics-26-transport-policy-objectives/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/25/national-policy-framework-forensics-27-transport-assessment/ http://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/national-planning-policy-framework-28-ports-airports-inland-waterways/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/national-planning-policy-framework-forensics-29-transport-locational-and-design-issues/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/national-planning-policy-framework-forensics30-parking/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/national-planning-policy-framework-forensics-31-communications-infrastructure/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/28/national-planning-policy-framework-forensics-32-minerals-objectives/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/28/national-planing-policy-framework-forensics33-minerals-landbanks-application-determination/ https://andrewlainton.wordpress.com/2011/06/28/national-planning-policy-framework-forensics-34-energy-minerals/
