Planning Advisory Service (PAS) Logo
Planning Advisory Service (PAS)
Open group | Started - July 2012 | Last activity - Today

PPS4 and protecting pubs

Former Member, modified 12 Years ago.

PPS4 and protecting pubs

All the forum discussions about PPS4 seem restricted to the well-trod ground of retail development. However, given 'Community Pubs' Minister Bob Neill's visit to the Great British Beer Festival, I think a bit more attention is needed for Policy EC13 of PPS4. I've seen it cited in two decisions by different Council's towards the end of last year. In one by North West Leicestershire District Council, EC14 was cited as potential support to refuse an application to convert a village pub to a house, in the absence of a local policy protecting pubs. As it was, the application was approved for other reasons. In a decision by Cambridge City Council, EC13 was used as a reason for refusal for the loss of a pub to a housing development - again, there was no local policy specifically protecting pubs. Does anyone have experience of defending or fighting an appeal on the use of EC13? Any thoughts about the use of EC13 as either the sole reason for refusing the loss of a pub, or to back up a local policy?
Former Member, modified 12 Years ago.

Re: PPS4 and protecting pubs

Andrew, We won an appeal some time ago. It was in a rural location in the Borough and the Inspector agreed with the reasons for refusal. The planning reference is MK/00571/96 – Permission refused for change of use of former public house (White Hart) to a dwelling. The subsequent appeal was dismissed on 23 January 1997. This maybe a long time ago but the principles are similar.
Former Member, modified 12 Years ago.

Re: PPS4 and protecting pubs

Andrew... we also recently defended our refusal for conversion of rural public house into residential very recently. We used EC13 as part of our refusal reasons and we defended our position very well at appeal. The Inspector considered that whilst there was another pub in the village, it offered a completely different level of service (gastro pub) and that the loss of the 'wet' pub was something that should be resisted as it was considered to be a valuable community facility. Roland Billington Planning Officer Swindon Borough Council