Spending CIL on Skills and Training. - Public forum - Planning Advisory Service (PAS)
Open group
|
Started - July 2012
|
Last activity - April
Spending CIL on Skills and Training.
Simon Pickstone, modified 9 Years ago.
Spending CIL on Skills and Training.
Advocate Posts: 104 Join Date: 22/04/13 Recent Posts
0
Does anybody have a view as to whether or not one would be on 'shaky ground' by placing 'employment and skills-type training' on the R123 List and seeking to fund it through CIL receipts? How tenuous is the argument that 'human resources' are a type of infrastructure? Thought/views are welcomed!
Richard Holmes, modified 9 Years ago.
RE: Spending CIL on Skills and Training.
New Member Posts: 13 Join Date: 20/10/11 Recent Posts
0
My view is that it isn't infrastructure so we have excluded it from CIL and would look to deliver through policy and conditions or S.106.
Simon Pickstone, modified 9 Years ago.
RE: Spending CIL on Skills and Training.
Advocate Posts: 104 Join Date: 22/04/13 Recent Posts
0
Thanks for your comments everybody :) Why not S106?...well...there is the ambition to minimise it's use...accepting it won't be scrapped alltogether which would make sense since it is forcing us to run two parallel processes for securing developer contributions...and then there is the faf of complying with the 'Pooling Restrictions' (whatever they actually mean!?).
Richard Holmes, modified 9 Years ago.
RE: Spending CIL on Skills and Training.
New Member Posts: 13 Join Date: 20/10/11 Recent Posts
0
If it's not infrastructure then it's not subject to the pooling restrictions? In any case, if it meets the three tests there would be no need to pool because the training would only be related to the development and meeting the requirements of just the development itself, so you wouldn't be pooling anything.
Hi Simon, If training is not "infrastructure" then its not caught by the pooling restrictions.Simon Pickstone:Thanks for your comments everybody :) Why not S106?...well...there is the ambition to minimise it's use...accepting it won't be scrapped alltogether which would make sense since it is forcing us to run two parallel processes for securing developer contributions...and then there is the faf of complying with the 'Pooling Restrictions' (whatever they actually mean!?).
Simon Pickstone, modified 9 Years ago.
RE: Spending CIL on Skills and Training.
Advocate Posts: 104 Join Date: 22/04/13 Recent Posts
0